Saturday, November 4, 2017

The Cat and the Canary (Universal, 1927)

by Mark Gabrish Conlan • Copyright © 2017 by Mark Gabrish Conlan • All rights reserved

Last night I ran Charles The Cat and the Canary and Nocturne. The main interest of The Cat and the Canary today is the incredibly stylish direction by Paul Leni, who was brought over from his native Germany by Universal and whose first American film this was. Basically, The Cat and the Canary was a tale (based on a well-known stage play) of a young heiress (Laura La Plante) whose relatives are trying to drive her insane so someone else will get the money instead — not exactly the freshest story line even then, but Leni’s direction and the nicely honed performances of La Plante and Tully Marshall (as the sinister attorney Roger Crosby, who ends up the first victim of the plot — did Marshall ever get to make a movie in which his character was alive and well at the fade-out?) make up for the triteness of the story. The opening sequence is magnificent — an unseen hand sweeps away cobwebs from a window to reveal the credits, and we’re told that the eccentric millionaire Cyrus West has built this home on the bank of the Hudson River in upstate New York. When we actually see the home it’s clear that the model he gave his architect must have been King Ludwig’s Neuschwanstein — the exterior (a model shot) is hardly more than a series of spires, and the interior (some of whose sets may well have been recycled for Dracula and some of the later Universal horror films) is full of long hallways with billowing drapes (anticipating the great effect in Jean Cocteau’s Beauty and the Beast 19 years later), secret passages and walls, bookcases and fireplaces that move aside to reveal them — we even get to see the innards of the walls, including the cobwebby gears that run these mechanisms. Then the spires dissolve into a stack of bottles, a title tells us that all Cyrus West’s relatives have gathered around him like cats around a canary — and around the bottles we see real cats, blown up to giant size, dwarfing the figure of Cyrus West in his rocking chair. After that opening just about anything would be a comedown — and there are parts of this film that are just plain silly, notably Creighton Hale’s “comic” performance as the scared romantic lead (one could readily see why Paramount had the idea this story could serve as a vehicle for Bob Hope — they bought the rights from Universal and remade it with Hope in 1939 — nine years after Universal’s own sound remake, retitled The Cat Creeps) — but Leni’s direction and the marvelous cinematography by Gilbert Warrenton (with the camera in almost constant motion, prowling through the hallways trying to keep up with the characters), along with some of the supporting players (the sinister housekeeper anticipates Judith Anderson’s role in Rebecca and the psychiatrist who’s supposed to decide whether the heroine is sane enough to inherit the West estate is so Caligari-esque I half-expected a plot twist would reveal that he is part of the plot to drive her insane!), make this a marvelous little gem of a movie and one of those you can look to as having set the clichés that were later run into the ground (but not before James Whale’s quirky sensibility could make fun of them in The Old Dark House at the same studio five years later!). I’d only seen The Cat and the Canary once before — in 1975, at the Pacific Film Archive in Berkeley, on a triple bill with White Zombie and Supernatural.

•••••

Our “feature” last night was the 1927 version of The Cat and the Canary, which I had in the backlog on a 100-minute Alpha Video DVD in wretched shape in terms of picture quality (Alpha Video seems to have done a straight transfer of one of the surviving original release prints without any attempt at digital image cleanup) but surprisingly 20 minutes longer than the “official” Kino version (which Charles and I had watched years before, when we were just starting to date, through a VHS tape I’d taken off Turner Classic Movies back when you could still record shows for later viewing without having to pay your cable company yet more ransom money on top of their basic bill) — though as I pointed out in my recent comments on the 1939 remake from Paramount with Bob Hope, what I’d really like to see is a digital restoration of the 100-minute version witih a bonus feature containing the surviving excerpts of the intervening version, a 1930 Universal talkie called The Cat Creeps (a couple of minutes of footage Universal used in a 1932 short called Boo and four Vitaphone soundtrack discs, representing about half the original movie, held by the Fafners at the UCLA Film and Television Archive). I’d wanted to watch the 1927 The Cat and the Canary since Hallowe’en night, when I saw the 1939 version (a movie that had somehow eluded me until now) as part of the Turner Classic Movies haunted-house marathon. The basis of the story was a stage play by John Willard that had a three-month, 148-performance run on Broadway from February to May 1922 (oddly Universal advertised the 1927 film as “Direct from Broadway!” even though the Broadway play had been presented five years earlier!); in the tail end of the silent era Universal bought the rights, assigned Robert Hill and Alfred A. Cohn to do the adaptation and Cohn to write the script — ironically Cohn would go from his work on this film to writing the 1927 Warner Bros. production The Jazz Singer, the film that would start the two-year process of putting silent movies out of business — and, in a decision that ensured both the artistic and commercial success of this film and its continuing interest for film buffs, decided to assign the direction to Paul Leni, a German expatriate, as his first American film. Leni had achieved an international hit with the 1924 film Waxworks, which was not only the first horror film ever set in a wax museum but featured Germany’s biggest star, Emil Jannings, along with Werner Krauss and Conrad Veidt (reunited from the cast of The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari five years earlier) and, as the juvenile male lead, cast Wilhelm Dieterle, who would later become a director and have a long career in Hollywood, much of it at Warner Bros., with his name Anglicized to William Dieterle. Waxworks cast Dieterle as a barker who invents colorful backstories about the figures in the wax museum in order to attract customers, and this enables Leni to tell stories about some of history’s most famous real-life villains: Caliph Haroun al-Raschid (Emil Jannings), Czar Ivan the Terrible (Conrad Veidt) and Jack the Ripper (Werner Krauss). 

The worldwide box-office success of Waxworks attracted attention from Hollywood, and Universal’s founding president Carl Laemmle, whose German ancestry (most of the other early Hollywood moguls came from Poland or elsewhere in Eastern Europe) gave him a leg up in the competition for German talent. He landed Leni and, for his first Hollywood assignment, gave him this rather prosaic story about a plot by a bunch of greedy relatives of a long-deceased rich man to do his heir, an innocent young heroine, out of her inheritance by driving her crazy. Leni kicked out the jams big-time and threw all the stylized devices that had made Waxworks a hit at this story. The 1927 and 1939 versions of The Cat and the Canary actually track quite closely story-wise: the mysteriously reclusive multimillionaire Cyrus West (he’s not listed on imdb.com but he’s depicted in the film in a marvelous prologue — Walter Anthony’s titles say that he was now at the end of his life and medicine could do no more for him, so he’s shown seated in a big chair surrounded by giant medicine bottles that dwarf him; they look like the skyline of the Emerald City in The Wizard of Oz, and it seems likely that the ripoff was deliberate, especially since the makers of The Wizard of Oz ripped off two famous gimmicks from Waxworks: the long entrance hall to Haroun al-Raschid’s office and the hourglass with which Ivan the Terrible signals his victims how long they have left to live before he has them executed) stipulates to his attorney, Roger Crosby (Tully Marshall, the marvelous corrupt villain of Erich von Stroheim’s The Merry Widow and Queen Kelly as well as the mastermind of the murders Alan Ladd is hired to commit in This Gun for Hire), that the will he’s written naming his heir not be read until 20 years after his death (the writers of the 1939 version, Walter DeLeon and Lynn Starling, cut that to 10), and West’s ominous mansion is in upstate New York instead of the Louisiana bayous. Also the name of the dead man was changed to “Norman” in 1939 (the reasons are unclear, though one imdb.com “Trivia” poster suggests that was because Mae West was still making movies in 1939) and his heiress was “Annabella West” (Laura LaPlante) in the original and “Joyce Norman” in 1939. Some people commenting on the 1939 version have said that the comic character played by Bob Hope was added, but he wasn’t: Paul Jones (Creighton Hale), the male lead in the 1927 film, is also very clearly played for comic relief: he’s equipped with Harold Lloyd-style glasses and is shown as a doofus with neither the resourcefulness of the real Lloyd nor the witticisms of Hope. 

Aside from Tully Marshall, easily a match for George Zucco’s marvelous work as the lawyer in 1939 (though Zucco, unlike Marshall, wasn’t allowed to play a character with a first name!), and Martha Maddox as the housekeeper who’s supposedly been the only person, aside from the attorney, in the West house during the 20 years since Cyrus’s death (she’s just as powerful and intimidating a screen presence as Gale Sondergaard in the remake even though, despite the hints in both version that the character is supposed to be at least partly African-American, she doesn’t look any more Black than Sondergaard did), the acting is nowhere near as good as it was in 1939. Universal spent six years trying to build Laura La Plante into a major star (while they fired Bette Davis after just six months, clearing the way for Warner Bros. to pick her up on the cheap and make millions off her!), but here, as in so many of her films, there’s nothing wrong with her performance but nothing particularly right about it either. She pretty much walks through the scenes, and though admittedly it’s a nothing damsel-in-distress role one misses the nuances Paulette Goddard brought to it 12 years later. And Creighton Hale is simply annoying, while the other actors — Forrest Stanley as Charles Wilder, the [spoiler alert!] alternate heir who sneaked a peek at the alternative second will naming him as the next heir in case Annabella died or went crazy, so he rigged up the West house with various secret passages and other devices that would drive Annabella insane; Arthur Edmund Carewe (so good as the undercover cop disguised as a Persian in the 1925 The Phantom of the Opera) rather dull as Harry Blythe, the third rival for Annabella’s affections; Gertrude Astor as Cecily and Flora Finch as Aunt Susan — are good enough at being overbearing we believe Cyrus West’s lament that when he was on his deathbed they were circling him like cats around a canary, but they have little left to offer. The 1927 version also retains the escaped lunatic from a nearby mental asylum (whom Charles disguises himself as to menace and try to kill the heroine) and the guard (George Siegmann) sent from the asylum to recapture him — but fortunately the writers of this version avoided the fillip at the end of the 1939 film that the guard had gone crooked and stolen the heroine’s priceless necklace, a part of the West fortune he had hidden in plain sight in the house and given her a special envelope telling her where to find it (a straightforward message in this film, a puzzle hero and heroine have to solve in 1939). 

What makes this film is Leni’s direction, from that opening surrealistic scene of Cyrus West surrounded by oversized medicine bottles through the X-ray shots of various mechanisms (when the clock that stopped at midnight 20 years earlier when West died suddenly starts again, Leni gives us some sinister-looking shots of its mechanism; later on Leni also gives us close-ups of how all the secret doorways and panels of the house work) and the scenes of apparently disembodied hands reaching out of wall openings to clutch out at the heroine, The Cat and the Canary is a superb triumph of style over (lack of) substance. Even the opening credits — a disembodied hand wiping away a thick layer of cobwebs to reveal the film’s title underneath (the sort of thing imdb.com has taken to calling a “crazy credit”) — sets the mood and makes sure we know from the outset that we are in for a very special film. The Cat and the Canary was one of the three films, along with The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1923) and The Phantom of the Opera (1925), that established Universal as the go-to studio for horror movies, though it’s significant that none of them have supernatural or science-fictional premises: the title characters of Hunchback and Phantom are physically deformed but otherwise normal human beings (the sorts of roles their star, Lon Chaney, Sr., preferred to play) and The Cat and the Canary is a collection of physically possible incidents. Indeed, there’s a sort of metafictional aspect to it (though I doubt even as sophisticated a filmmaker as Leni intended it), in that the devices Charles Wilder has rigged up in the house to make Annabella West crazy (or at least to make her think she’s crazy and therefore act out as insane) are the same ones filmmakers would use to dramatize a supernatural haunted-house story. (Come to think of it, maybe Leni did intend it: after all, Waxworks was also a movie about storytelling and myth-making.) 

Though Alpha Video didn’t have access to a good print and didn’t do any real rehab on the source they did have, they equipped the film with a good musical score, an appropriately somber combination of piano, electronic organ and strings that got a bit monotonous towards the end but still “worked” a lot better than the random assemblage of public-domain recordings other cheap DVD companies have slapped onto silent classics. The Cat and the Canary is a great movie that makes one wish Leni had lived longer and done more — and also that more of the work he did do survives: his second Universal film, The Chinese Parrot, is lost completely (except for a few intriguing-looking stills), a real pity because it was based on Earl Derr Biggers’ second Charlie Chan novel and, like the also lost 1925 silent serial of the first Biggers Chan novel The House Without a Key, actually cast a real-life Asian (Japanese actor Sojin Kamiyama) as Chan. Leni’s third Universal film, The Man Who Laughs, was also long thought lost, though it eventually turned up (at least partial prints from the U.S. and Italy from which a complete version could be assembled did) and was a major production, with heroine Mary Philbin from Hunchback and Phantom as a blind girl who falls in love with Gywnplaine (Conrad Veidt), a British heir who was kidnapped by Gypsies and turned into a hideous monster with his mouth frozen in a permanent, hideous grin. (Batman creator Bob Kane based the character of the Joker on Jack P. Pierce’s makeup for Veidt in this film; it was Pierce’s first job at Universal and he’d go on to create all the famous Universal monsters: Frankenstein’s creation, Dracula, the Mummy and the Wolf-Man.) Then sound came in and Leni did a part-talkie called The Last Warning, which I understand is also at least partially lost, dealing with a series of murders in a supposedly jinxed theatre. Then Leni got blood poisoning and died at only 40 years old — one wonders if he’d lived if he’d have been assigned to direct the Universal Dracula and we could have had a better film than Tod Browning’s rather dull version worthwhile only for preserving the performances of Bela Lugosi and Dwight Frye. — 11/4/17